Skip to content

Military strikes on Syria ‘as early as Thursday,’ US officials say

by on August 27, 2013

The United States could hit Syria with three days of missile strikes, perhaps beginning Thursday,

in an attack meant more to send a message to the Syrian regime than to topple Bashar al-Assad or cripple his military, senior U.S. officials told NBC News.

The disclosure fed the growing drumbeat around the world for military action against Syria, believed to have used chemical weapons in recent days against scores of civilians and rebels who have been fighting the government for two years.

In three days of strikes, senior officials said, the Pentagon could assess the effectiveness of the first wave and target what was missed in further rounds.

The White House said Tuesday that it is not considering the deliberate overthrow of Assad as an option as it weighs its response.

“The options that we are considering are not about regime change,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said during a daily briefing with reporters.ey are about responding to the clear violation of an international standard that prohibits the use of chemical weapons.” Underscoring the urgency facing world leaders, the British prime minister called Parliament back from vacation and said it would take a vote Thursday on action, and U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the American military was “ready to go.”A day earlier, using forceful language, Secretary of State John Kerry said that Syrian chemical attacks were a “moral obscenity” and said the regime of President Bashar Assad had not just used chemical agents but covered up the evidence.On Tuesday, the United Nations said that its team investigating chemical-weapons attacks in Syria would delay its next outing by a day, to Wednesday. The team came under fire from unidentified snipers Monday on its way to check out the site of a suspected chemical attack near the Syrian capital of Damascus.In Cairo, the Arab League said it held Assad responsible for a chemical attack near the Syrian capital. Qatar, Saudi Arabia and other countries condemned the use of unconventional weapons.
Support from the Arab League, even if limited, would provide crucial diplomatic cover for a Western strike on Syria. Action through the United Nations is unlikely because Russia, which supports the Assad regime, has a veto in the Security Council.Having fled the violence within Syria, nearly 2 million refugees, a million of them children, are living in refugee camps in Jordan. NBC’s Ann Curry reports.

American missile strikes would almost certainly be launched from Navy destroyers or submarines in the Mediterranean Sea. The United States has moved destroyers closer to Syria, which sits on the sea’s eastern edge, in recent days, but that was mostly a symbolic move. U.S. Tomahawk missiles are so precise they can hit not just buildings but specific windows, and could hit Syrian targets from far further west in the Mediterranean.

According to Navy officials, there are currently four destroyers lined up ready to strike: The USS Barry, the USS Mahan, the USS Ramage, and the USS Gravely.

On Tuesday, a fifth guided missile destroyer, the USS Stout, also entered the Mediterranean, through the Straights of Gibraltar, but officials said it will not take part in any cruise missile attack against Syria.

“The four destroyers now in place have more than enough cruise missiles” to carry out any potential mission, according to one official.

Kerry appeared to signal imminent military intervention when he appeared before reporters Monday at the State Department. He spoke of being personally disturbed by images of bodies contorting in spasm, and entire Syrian families killed without a drop of blood.

A French diplomatic source told Reuters that Syria’s use of chemical weapons had been going on for several months and was now taking place on a massive scale.

“France will not shirk its responsibilities,” the source said.

Some U.S. allies, notably Britain, have signaled that a limited strike on Syria could take place without U.N. Security Council approval. But Russia and China both made clear Tuesday that they would be deeply displeased with such a move.

A look back at the conflict that has overtaken the country.

The Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, said it would be a “very grave violation of international law,” and China said through its government-run news service that the U.S. must refrain from “hasty armed intervention.”

The news service issued a commentary Tuesday reminding readers that the United States invaded Iraq in 2003 on the grounds that it possessed banned weapons that were never found.

Meanwhile, demonstrating the vast global reach of the Syrian crisis, a Japanese newspaper reported Tuesday that North Korea had tried to send gas masks to Syria before they were seized in Turkey.

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s